chunk 2: RTFM
RTFM
cute animals
abbreviations
about boxes
about arrows
Parens show labels.
Blue letters.
About articles.
Difference between 'I write' and 'I am writing'.
about sexism
^

(Technically these are called "navigation icons", but most of them look like cartoons of cute animals.)
On top of every article you can see --
cat -- takes to the CATalog page, obviously.
book -- list of all articles in roughly alphabetical order. Use control-f to find there whatever you want to find.
grid -- rules in the
AZ -- rules in alphabetical order. Useful if you don't know if you need rosupi or rossupi.
rabbit -- list of all boxed words. See about boxes for details.
example-finder hedgehog -- if you remember that you read the example word
turtle and spider -- ignore these two. These are scaffolding and I'm using them myself while I build the website. I'll remove them when it's finished.
When searching in the pages that have lots of Sanskrit words in them, you have to spell things like you say them --
Some pages have priods at the start and end of things, so that if you type control-F tuk period you get things that end in tuk.
For the relationship between the swastika symbol and Nazism, see Wikipedia on Swastika.
^

afaik "as far as i know"
aka "also known as"
ceteris paribus = "everything else being the same"
eg = exempli gratia = for instance
etc. = et caetera = and so on
ff = and following, and others
idk = "I have no clue, sorry"
ie = id est = this is, namely, in other words
mutatis mutandis = "after making the necessary changes"
wafti = We Apologize For The Inconvenience
wtf =
Back to RTFM .
^

This website has lots of strange words like the " chop", " wordfinal", and " cluster" (see for instance rule chop wordfinal cluster ), which appear within boxes. I call these "jargon" words, or terms. They do not have the ordinary meanings used in normal English, but special meanings used only when talking grammar. For instance, plain "many" means "many, but if I write it as " many", within a box, it means "three or more".
If you click the boxed many, that should take you to a page that explains what many means.
If you want to check the meaning of " many", but you see no boxed " many" nearby, click the rabbit icon. That will show a list of all boxed words.
Words with a green box, like many and number, have a green box because they are made up of Roman letters. Words with a bluish box like su and au are made of Sanskrit letters.
^

In these pages, arrows show that some rule changed something. For instance, if I write --
This means that some rule changed
There are several sort of arrows.
PLAIN ARROWS
Plain arrows just mean that something changed because of a rule, but they don't show what rule made the change. for instance, here some rule changed ta into te''' --
But I don't tell you which rule made the change. I do that when I think youcan figure out yourself which rule made the change, or when it is the same rule mentioned in earlier examples.
WIGGLY ARROWS
Wiggly arrows just mean that something changed because of more than one rule, but they don't show what rules are those.
CIRCLED ARROWS
Click a circled arrow to get to the rule that made that change.
Sometimes when an arrow has no circle, you can know which rule worked by clicking what is after the arrow. For instance --
As + ta →
Here clicking the te''' you can get to the rule that made the
RED ARROWS
A red arrow means that the rule that we are explaining right now made that change.
For instance, inside rule Tita, you can see this example --
Here the red arrow shows that rule Tita worked, changing
COSMETIC ARROWS
Sometimes I use an arrow just because I am removing plus signs, spaces and labels, even though no rule is making any actual change. For instance, here --
no rule is actually removing anything. It's just that the label letters are written and the left of the arrow (so that you may jump to the zap and tip pages) but are not written at the right (so that the word
Back to RTFM .
^

When I explain the affix zyan in page zyan, I write it as
In page yak I type
Similarly, if I write "the root
Sometimes, I write a moondot (
Example.
I usually just write "the root gam", because most of the time students don't need to know that this root carries
Yet, in some places(such as puSAdi;dyutAdy;LditaH) I spell that
^

The blue letters of this website must be pronounced as they are written. For instance, here --
the blue
There are two kinds of blue letters --
Back to RTFM .
^

Many grammar books use only grammatically correct English in translations. Like --
But I often use an I-Tarzan-you-Jane style of English --
I do this because every Sanskrit
My Polish, Russian and Japanese students are very happy with this. The others get used to it soon.
# I do this because it makes my students less confused. Every
Similarly, if I translate
Also, if I explain that
(differencebetweeniwrit) (differeti)
^

Somebody, who has much more experience with spoken English than I have, told me once that I should not write my translations of Sanskrit verbs in this style --
because it I get a more natural-sounding English if I translate like this --
That is quite a valid objection, because, In english, a sentence like "I cook bananas" only sounds natural in contexts like --
"I cook bananas for breakfast"
"I cook bananas every Saturday"
"I only cook bananas when I make Cuba-style rice"
However, my readers should remember that "I cook" and "I am cooking" are the same in Sanskrit,
^

The verb
Please remember that even though I use "he" most of the time, EVERY verb in the third person singular may mean "he / she / it".
Sanskrit has no words for "he / she / it". In their place they often use words meaning "this one" or "that one", such as
I do not write "he / she / it lives" only because I'm lazy.
The preferential use of "he" rather than "she" might be misinterpreted to mean sexism. It actually is due to sloth, which is worse: I'm too lazy to type the "s". Notice that sloth made it into the list of seven capital sins, while sexism didn't.
This dont-trust-the-pronoun rule applies only to verbs proper, and not to verblikes, that are nouns and therefore show gender --
chunk 2: RTFM