overview of flat and bent
rules that should be studied first
choose-
change-
choose-
change-
wordfinal
Different kinds of nothing.
The affixes that replace tenses can mean the doer or not.
When they do not mean the doer, they are always bent, by bhAva;karmaNoH.
When they mean the doer, it depends on the root --
There are flatty roots like
and bendy roots like
and flattybendy roots like
and there are a lot of grammar rules that explain which roots are flatty, which are bendy, and which are flattybendy.
Or, at least, that is what the grammar rules say. Please be warned that lots of authors in the last three thousand years either never heard of those rules, or unapologetically ignored them. So, don't panic when you find a
Here the
(rulesthatshouldbestudi) (rulesthfi)
Usually, language tutorials assume that the reader will study the book starting at lesson 1, then do the exercises, then go on to lesson 2. Lesson 2 is written in such a way that to understand it you need to have studied lesson 1, but you don't need to know anything in lessons 3, 4 etc.
We are used to that plan because most textbooks teaching anything follow it.
The
But the work itself does not say which parts have to be taught first. Every teacher decides that.
Tradition tells us that the first thing the students have to do is learning to chant the zivasUtra from memory. After that they are taught the Adirantyena rule -- "if the zivasUtra have
Many teachers did not even try to teach any rules until they were teaching something where the rule was useful. For instance, suppose the teacher was helping the students to learn the bhg. When getting to verse 30 of chapter 1, to the words
So, if you are just curious about the grammar, and don't have a teacher to feed you drops of it in appropriate moments, where should you start?
My advice --
start with the zivasUtra
learn about the uses of cases in rules
then do some examples of GyApprA
then do some examples of kartarizap with zapclass roots.
Rule lasya says that every tense affix, after we add it after a root, must be replaced with one of the eighteen tiG affixes. How do we know which affix to choose? There are many rules teaching which one.
The most important rule is laHkarmaNi. This says, among other things, that we may choose an affix that has the same number and person as the doer of the root. For instance, if we want to say that the hens cross, or crossed, or will cross the road, then the doer of the root
(We know that we must use a plural affix because rule bahuSubahu teaches so, and we need a third person affix because rule zeSeprathamaH says so.)
Now, rule tiGastrINi teaches that six of the tiG affixes are third person, namely tiptasjhi and tAtAJjha.
Then, rule tAnyeka tells us that the third affix of each group of three is plural. So only the affixes jhi and jha are third person and plural.
Of those two, jhi is flat and jha is bent. We will use jhi unless some rule says that we must or may use the bent.
So the verb we need will be made by replacing any tense with jhi. For instance, to mean present time, we add laT to the root, then replace laT with jhi --
To express past time, we may use laG or other tenses. when we add laG and replace it with jhi we get --
(wordfinalsandhirules) (wordf)
... very lame, needs total rewrite
The wordfinal
Let me show some examples of the effects of these rules.
(A) when a word ends in
(B) when a word ends in
(C) when a word ends in
There are one or two hundred such rules. Please DO NOT PANIC. You do not have to study them or memorize them before you get used to do what they say. And you don't have to do that afterwards either.
QRAQRAQRA
...
QRA QRA QRA
(differentkindsofnothin) (differeth)
The
There are different kinds of nothing --
(1) Replacing something with lopa deletes one letter. When rule saMyogAnta commands "replace
(2) luk is a more destructive sort of nothing. When SaDbhyoluk teaches "replace zas with luk", that turns the whole zas into nothingness. So
Not only that. If adding an affix made changes to its stem, replacing that affix with luk will roll back those changes.
(3) replacing an affix with lup has the same effects that luk has, and it also rolls back the changes that the original affix made to the gender and number of its stem.
(4) zlu is a sort of nothing that, when added after a root, makes the root reduplicate (see zlau).